Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Home RSS
 
 
 

War of words breaks out in Jefferson County

December 21, 2012
By MARK LAW - For The Weirton Daily Times (mlaw@heraldstaronline.com) , Weirton Daily Times

STEUBENVILLE, Ohio - Progress Alliance will go out with a war of words.

Members of Community Improvement Corp. were at the Jefferson County commissioners' meeting Thursday to discuss funding for Progress Alliance, its public-private economic development arm, but instead certain members became the target of criticism from the commissioners.

The commissioners had been providing $75,000 annually in funding to Progress Alliance for economic development work in the county. The commissioners recently announced the board would provide up to $100,000 in funding to the port authority, leaving Progress Alliance wondering about its funding.

The CIC sent a letter to the commissioners on Dec. 10 stating its funding has dropped to a level where Progress Alliance needs to consider a timetable for the transition of pending economic development projects to the port authority, as well as turning over management of the county's industrial park, the revolving loan fund and the handling of the tax incentive review council meetings.

Several CIC members were at the meeting Thursday when county Commissioner Thomas Graham read a four-page prepared statement in which he alleged there had been "unethical decisions" made by the Progress Alliance.

Graham said Jim Emmerling of EM Media, a current board member, was quoted as saying the CIC has "done a damn good job."

"It is no wonder Mr. Emmerling thinks that since his company EM Media has received over $297,000 from the CIC for media campaigns on behalf of the CIC. The problem is this: The jobs he received were seldom, if ever, put out to bid to get competitive pricing. Because he was a member, he got a deal. But that is not fair or ethical to the taxpayers or other companies who might want to bid on the job. I and others raised our concerns about this when we found out and did not make them public, and we went along but complained hoping it would stop. No wonder Mr. Emmerling wants the CIC to survive," Graham said.

Emmerling, after the meeting, responded by saying he questions the motivation behind the statements. He said he has been a paying partner in Progress Alliance for about 15 years. He said the $297,000, which was spent over almost 20 years, was for media campaigns, such as the Burb of the Burg advertising campaign targeting the Pittsburgh area.

"EM Media made little to no income as a result," Emmerling said.

He said the money went to buy time on local and Pittsburgh media outlets, adding his company has provided free services to Progress Alliance over the years, such as allowing his building to be used.

"I did it to help the community," he said.

The advertising agreements with EM MEdia were voted upon by the Progress Alliance board, of which the three county commissioners were members.

Emmerling asked that if Graham thought the matter was unethical, why did the commissioner hire EM Media to handle advertising for Graham during his last three election campaigns.

County Commissioner Tom Gentile questioned how money given to Progress Alliance was being spent, pointing to items such as golf outings and a series of breakfast meetings that Gentile said are not directly tied to economic development.

Gentile said he wants to reach out to the investors of the CIC to get money directed toward the port authority,

County Commissioner David Maple said the county increased funding to Progress Alliance from $50,000 to $75,000 and now will invest $100,000 a year in the port authority for economic development.

"It is disheartening at this time for people to imply the commissioners are standing in the way of economic development.

"It is not fair and not accurate," Maple said.

Maple believes the port authority will be a "better engine" for economic development in the county.

He said part of the $100,000 to the port authority can be used by the CIC until the port authority takes over the economic development job to "make sure there is a smooth transition."

Robert Chapman, CIC board president, who was at the meeting, said he was disappointed by the statements made by the commissioners.

"I didn't want Jefferson County to get a black eye but both eyes were blackened with those comments," Chapman said.

Ken Perkins, CIC treasurer, said he didn't want the meeting to become a public spectacle.

Chapman said the CIC was told to be at the meeting to receive a simple yes or no answer to the funding question.

(Law can be contacted at mlaw@heraldstaronline.com)

 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: