Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Home RSS
 
 
 

Closing delayed for airport tower

April 8, 2013
By JENNIFER COMPSTON-STROUGH - For The Weirton Daily Times with AP Dispatches , Weirton Daily Times

WHEELING - Tom Tominack was relieved to get a call from Sen. Joe Manchin's office Friday informing him the air traffic control tower at the Wheeling-Ohio County Airport would not be closed on April 22.

Plans to halt operations of control towers at 149 small airports, due to begin this weekend because of government-wide spending cuts, are being delayed until mid-June, federal regulators announced Friday.

As manager of the Wheeling facility, Tominack had been working with Manchin, D-W.Va., and other federal lawmakers to persuade the Federal Aviation Administration to change its plan.

On Friday, the FAA said it needs more time to deal with legal challenges to the closures. In addition, about 50 airport authorities and other "stakeholders" have indicated they want to fund the operations of the towers themselves rather than see them shut down, and more time will be needed to work out those plans, the agency said in a statement.

Despite the delay, the FAA said it will stop funding all 149 of the airport towers, which are operated by private contractors, on June 15. Under the new schedule, the closures will be implemented at once, rather than a gradual phase-in as had been planned.

Tominack said the closures had been scheduled to take effect in phases, beginning with the closure of 24 towers Sunday. The Ohio County facility would have been among the second group of closures, while the final tower closures were set to occur May 5.

"The FAA was moving too quickly," Tominack said. "They were not giving airports an opportunity to adjust."

Tominack said local, state and federal officials representing West Virginia had been working with the three airports in the state that would have been affected. He said the cooperative effort aimed to find other solutions to the financial challenges faced by the FAA due to the "very drastic" nature of the proposed cuts.

Obama administration officials have said the closures are necessary to accomplish automatic spending cuts required by Congress.

Airport operators in several states, including Florida, Illinois and Washington state, and the U.S. Contract Tower Association, which represents the companies that operate contract towers, have filed lawsuits with the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington seeking to halt the closures.

The suits contend that the closures violated a federal law meant to ensure major changes at airports do not erode safety, and unfairly targeted the program for an outsized share of the more than $600 million the agency is required to trim from its budget by the end of September.

"The administration has decided to make tower closures the poster child of sequestration (automatic spending cuts)," said the group's director, J. Spencer Dickerson. "We believe there are other ways they could have skinned this cat."

Federal officials have insisted that the closures wouldn't affect safety. And there is evidence that with improving safety, some of the closures would make economic sense.

It turns out that the FAA has been using 30-year-old data on aircraft collisions to justify the cost of operating many of the control towers, even though accident rates have improved significantly over that time.

Had the FAA used more current data, it's probable that some low-traffic airport towers operated by private contractors would no longer have met the agency's criteria for funding, industry officials say. But the FAA has long been under pressure from members of Congress to open new towers at airports in their states, not to close them.

The FAA began paying contractors to staff and operate towers at a handful of small airports after President Ronald Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981. Today, there are 251 towers operated by private contractors at airports across the country at an average annual cost of more than $500,000 each.

 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: