Trending
To the Editor,
"Every high civilization has decayed, by forgetting obvious things."--G.K. Chesterton
A Canadian cancer charity has apologized for a statement, in which they erroneously used the offensive term "cervix," instead of the more "transgender-friendly" verbiage, "front hole."
Because, y'know, transgender "women" don't have cervices, and we absolutely must kowtow to the tender feelings of these delusional bullies; these intellectual giants who insist upon "inclusion," even unto the exclusion of actual, biological women, to whose essences they desperately aspire.
The people who do have cervices.
"Female mothers," that is, actual, biological women who have babies, are often referred to now as "chest feeders." This is, naturally, because trans "women" with children (formerly known as "fathers") cannot perform this function, yet insist upon being acknowledged, somehow, as their chosen "gender identity."
"Inclusion" rarely includes logic.
These are just two examples; they abound, nowadays. They're changing the language to more ambiguous, less accurate terms, quite simply, to accommodate the fantasies of untreated delusional people.
I recently read of yet another instance of a father aggressively blocking a transgender "woman" from using the Ladies' restroom while his young daughter was inside. Go, dad.
If it wasn't usually male-to-female transgenders making that argument, it wouldn't be as bad. I keep up on this absurd issue, and while I'm sure they exist, I don't know when I've seen a man griping about female-to-males using the men's room. While it's just an oddity for men, it's an actual danger for women and young girls, as many of these people do indeed have histories of sexual predation, which is actually fairly common in that community, though perilously downplayed.
However, dawn is breaking.
As this ridiculous, nonsense trend lingers, more stories of horribly unpleasant, unsatisfying transition experiences emerge. Lawsuits, what it will ultimately take to end this, are popping up.
One young woman, as a child encouraged by her parents to "become" a boy, is now suing her parents, and the surgeons who performed the procedures.
She insists she was never told the negatives. The scary truths and drawbacks, such as setting yourself up for a lifetime of endless infections and painful medical procedures, possible cancers, inability to achieve sexual gratification, due to modification of genitalia...all of these, part of it. She apparently was never told any of that. They blew nothing but sunshine at her.
Gee-whiz; it's almost like poisoning yourself with hormones and drugs, and mutilating yourself with ill-advised, expensive surgeries are very often not the solutions they were looking for, or sold, by the agenda-pushing activists on social media. Or by those in the Psychiatric and Medical industries.
Eventually, it'll reach critical mass, where the unpleasant stories will be undeniable by the activists; they won't be able to dismiss or vilify them, anymore.
Waste all the time and money you want, but you're stuck with the biology you're born with. Makeup and a dress, and "feminine"--or "masculine"--affectations will never make you what you're not. Transgender "women" will still need prostate exams, after age 40.
Rob Denham
Weirton